"Psychology is not a science." I have even heard that "psychology is bullshit."
While the second sentiment is not uncommon (over 700,000 hits on google), the first, "psychology is not a science," is VERY common (over 50 MILLION hits on ze goog). In fact, I just ran into one such comment and engaged in a small conversation regarding it.
An online friend of mine, who is a molecular biology (or was it microbiology?....I can't recall, but something to that effect) major recently made a comment to this end on a blog of mine, in which I had interviewed someone who is going to be majoring in pyschology (which was the discipline in which I attained my BA as well). Here is his comment:
I think a psychology major is so lame.His response to me after I asked him for an elaboration was as follows:
Well from all of my friend's experiences they say they absolutely got nothing out of psychology so similar to what Lenano is planning on doing they all ended up changing their majors. I just don't like it as a science; at least not compared to sciences such as biology, chemistry, and physics.I responded to him with the following:
Sure psychology incorporates some aspects of biology and chemistry, but for the most part unlike those sciences, it doesn't provide conclusive theories. Since psychology uses a lot of deductive reasoning most psychological theories are in actuality hypotheses. I do however commend psychology for elaborating on stuff like social sciences and stuff, but for the most part I think other sciences could figure that stuff out and I consider psychology to be basically philosophy involving biology and chemistry. I may be stupid for saying that but that's just how I feel towards psychology.
One problem with this is that many psychological theories are testable, repeatable, and falsifiable. They also, just like theories in other disciplines, are based upon evidence. They are the explanations for the facts, and therefore, they ARE theories as opposed to just hypotheses. I see what you are saying about the nature of deductive reasoning, don't get me wrong, but psychology has changed much in the last 50 or so years.What do you think? Is psychology a science?
Biology might point out that x follows from Y, but the manifestation of X will have to be pyschology. So if you think that form and function are good, but the interactions between and processes behind those functions are ''lame,'' well, I'd say you're looking at an incomplete picture. Without psychology, you'd have neurology but no neuropsychology. Without psychology, you'd have evolutionary biology but no evolutionary psychology.
Psyc is sort of like the why to the how. And the why toay is functionally much different than the why's of people like Freud and Jung. Of course, there are still those fanciful pychoanalytical theories (or hell, hypotheses) out there, as you drive at, and I agree. Even back when I was a fresh undergrad, I had issues with that stuff.
And psychology is the reason I am in the career I am in today.
I don't understand how psychology is not a science. It is the observation of human behavioral patterns. What would you call it? Art? An abstract thing? If it isn't a science, what is it?
ReplyDeleteA aberration?
ReplyDelete;)
I meant to say AN aberration, not A aberration.
ReplyDeleteI'm actually a bio-engineer major (more specifically a biomedical engineer major, but it's the same thing). You actually opened my eyes when it came to this topic and I kind of feel retarded for making some of those comments. I think psychology is a science and also isn't a science at the same time. I think modern psychology is a science because it uses a lot of the scientific methods but at the same time by definition, psychology is not a science.
ReplyDeleteSorry, got the major wrong. Very impressive either way, seriously :)
ReplyDeleteDon't feel reatarded. One cannot be knowledgeable on every subject. I'm quite ignorant when it comes to biomedical engineering, believe me!