Preface
I am going to blog about something that has been on my mind for quite some time and something I have consequently been itching to get down on 'paper.' I'm excited but a bit apprehensive, as this is going to be one of my most difficult blogs ever attempted.
The Topic and Thesis of the Blog
TOPIC:
Anthropogenic Global Warming (Global Warming caused by, at least in part, if not in full, by human activity).
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
Ongoing Debate With Rhology, the Christian Apologist: Special Pleading and Hypocrisy?
EDIT: Here is his response to this post. I will be responding to it in time. It's headache inducing, so I may have to do it bit by bit ;)
This is a response to THIS POST, which itself was a response to MY RESPONSE to THIS POST by the user Rhology. That post of his is a response to my Initial Post which was a response to an older post of his (linked to in my original response post).
This might be starting to get confusing. Just follow the links, it's not nearly as confusing as it may sound. Basically, this is the thrid or fourth round in an ongoing debate of sorts with the Christian Apologist Rhology from the RHOBLOGY BLOG.
This response is definitely the most heated of what has thus far been a very civil, but strident, debate. I think I may have just opened the gates to some anger and perhaps even insults, although this was certainly not my intention. Sometimes, to be honest, you have to ruffle some feathers. Regular readers of mine may be scratching their heads at this point, wondering if perhaps I have sustained a head injury or something, as I am known for my fiestiness and proclivity to 'let someone have it' if they, in my estimation, deserve it. I only make these disclaimers in this case because this is someone who, up until this particular comment of his that I am responding to, was open and honest, with a respectful demeanor. Well.....I am afaid the demeanor may have remained intact, but the intellectual honesty seems to have taken the night off.....Let's get into it, shall we?
This is a response to THIS POST, which itself was a response to MY RESPONSE to THIS POST by the user Rhology. That post of his is a response to my Initial Post which was a response to an older post of his (linked to in my original response post).
This might be starting to get confusing. Just follow the links, it's not nearly as confusing as it may sound. Basically, this is the thrid or fourth round in an ongoing debate of sorts with the Christian Apologist Rhology from the RHOBLOGY BLOG.
This response is definitely the most heated of what has thus far been a very civil, but strident, debate. I think I may have just opened the gates to some anger and perhaps even insults, although this was certainly not my intention. Sometimes, to be honest, you have to ruffle some feathers. Regular readers of mine may be scratching their heads at this point, wondering if perhaps I have sustained a head injury or something, as I am known for my fiestiness and proclivity to 'let someone have it' if they, in my estimation, deserve it. I only make these disclaimers in this case because this is someone who, up until this particular comment of his that I am responding to, was open and honest, with a respectful demeanor. Well.....I am afaid the demeanor may have remained intact, but the intellectual honesty seems to have taken the night off.....Let's get into it, shall we?
Labels:
apologetics,
atheism,
christianity,
debate,
dilemma,
euthyphro,
evidence,
god,
logic,
magx01,
morality,
morals,
objective,
rhoblogy,
strawman,
subjective,
the thoughtful gamer,
william lane craig
Response to the Response to my Response by a Christian Apologist
This is a response to THIS POST by the user Rhology (who I accidentally refer to as Rhoblogy in this...sorry man). That post of his is a response to my Initial Post which was a response to an older post of his (linked to in my original response post).
Here goes.
Here goes.
Labels:
apologetics,
atheism,
christianity,
cosmic,
debate,
evidence,
god,
guilt,
logic,
magx01,
morality,
morals,
objective,
overseer,
rhoblogy,
strawman,
subjective,
the thoughtful gamer
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Dead Rising Case Zero WAS a Demo. DEFINITIVE PROOF!
Here is definitive proof that Dead Rising Case Zero is indeed intended to act as a demo (as previously discussed HERE and in more detail, HERE). It was a replacement for the traditional free demo model and Capcom would like to use this going forward:
IGN: Case Zero came out just a few days back. Do you think releasing a paid-for prologue is a better idea than a free demo?
IGN: Case Zero came out just a few days back. Do you think releasing a paid-for prologue is a better idea than a free demo?
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Video Game Addiction: Is it Real?
In this article I aim to take a modestly comprehensive look at the notion of video game addiction, and try to get to the bottom of the hype. Is video game addiction real, or not? Is it fact, or fiction? Truth, or Lie? Is it a reality facing gamers today, or a total myth? Is it a symptom of some other problem (perhaps an impulse control disorder), a condemnation of 'too much time' spent on a hobby unbecoming of an older teenager or even adult (as judged by a non gamer, usually issued forth through the cavernous maw that is a generation gap), a cultural phenomenon, perhaps the manifestation of an attempted escape from too much educational pressure put on the youth, or something else?
And if it is indeed real, are the video games an outlet for an addicted personality, or are they a causal factor? Does that distinction even matter? And, lastly, if it is indeed real, if there are people out there who seem to be addicted to video games, what does the research say regarding incidence rates, severity, and treatment outcomes? Is the media reporting this fairly, not taking it seriously enough, or blowing it way out of proportion?
These questions and more are going to be addressed as I tackle the issue of video game addiction. Is it fact or fiction?
And if it is indeed real, are the video games an outlet for an addicted personality, or are they a causal factor? Does that distinction even matter? And, lastly, if it is indeed real, if there are people out there who seem to be addicted to video games, what does the research say regarding incidence rates, severity, and treatment outcomes? Is the media reporting this fairly, not taking it seriously enough, or blowing it way out of proportion?
These questions and more are going to be addressed as I tackle the issue of video game addiction. Is it fact or fiction?
Labels:
b.s.,
bias,
bullshit,
control,
cultural,
disorder,
fact,
fiction,
generation gap,
hypocrisy,
impulse,
magx01,
myth,
real,
research,
the thoughtful gamer,
thethoughtfulgamer.com,
video game addiction
Saturday, September 11, 2010
INSANE VIDEO!! Republican Candidate for Stark County (Ohio, USA) Treasurer Phil Davison is BATSHIT CRAZY!!!
Here's a video of Republican Phil Davison (Ohio) delivering a speech in an effort to attain the Republican nomination for Stark County Treasurer. Of course, I say 'delivering a speech' in the loosest of possible manners. Click to play the video and witness the mother of all political gaffes. Then try to figure out what the HELL his deal is.
Seriously, Phil.....Why So Serious?
Btw, he lost. Surprising, I know!
Seriously, Phil.....Why So Serious?
Btw, he lost. Surprising, I know!
Labels:
conservative,
county,
crazy,
davison,
insane,
magx01,
ohio,
phil,
phil davison,
republican,
speech,
stark,
stark county,
the thoughtful gamer,
thethoughtfulgamer.com,
treasurer
Friday, September 10, 2010
Response to a Christian on the topic of Atheist Morality
I have been engaged in a discussion with a christian apologist, who seems to have been at it for a long time. After some back and forth (during which he was refreshingly honest about his opinions, specifically those relating to the issue of morality in the Old Testament) this was the message directed at me, regarding atheist morality, atheistic inconsistency, and the accuracy of atheistic claims in the comment section of this person's blog (THIS is the post in question).
Labels:
apologetics,
atheism,
christianity,
cosmic,
debate,
evidence,
god,
guilt,
logic,
magx01,
morality,
morals,
objective,
overseer,
rhoblogy,
strawman,
subjective,
the thoughtful gamer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)